Former Australian fast bowler Mitchell Johnson has taken a strong stand against fellow countryman Josh Hazlewood, criticising his decision to put the Indian Premier League (IPL) ahead of representing Australia in the all-important ICC World Test Championship (WTC) Final. Johnson’s comments have ignited debate in the cricketing world about player priorities, national commitments, and the growing influence of franchise cricket.
A Question of Priorities
In a recent interview, Johnson expressed disappointment over Hazlewood’s choice to participate in the lucrative IPL 2023 despite nursing an injury and with the WTC Final on the horizon. According to Johnson, Hazlewood’s decision “raised eyebrows” within the Australian cricketing fraternity, as many expected the pacer to focus on recovering fully for the WTC Final — a match that holds significant importance in the Test cricket calendar.
“Choosing IPL over the WTC Final doesn’t sit right with a lot of fans, and frankly, with a lot of past players too,” said Johnson. “You’re representing your country in a format that defines legacy — and the final no less — not just another bilateral series.”
Hazlewood’s Injury Concerns and Timeline
Josh Hazlewood had been managing a side strain and other minor niggles for several months leading up to the IPL. Despite not being fully fit, he joined Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) midway through the season. While he played a few matches, his participation further aggravated concerns over his match fitness and workload management.
Many believed that Hazlewood’s time would have been better spent in recovery and preparation for the WTC Final. Australia’s pace attack relies heavily on Hazlewood’s precision and consistency, especially in swinging and seaming conditions.
Franchise vs. Country: The Never-Ending Debate
Johnson’s remarks have reignited the long-standing debate over the precedence of franchise leagues over international duties. While players often have financial incentives to play in tournaments like the IPL, purists argue that national representation should always come first — particularly in a format as prestigious and demanding as Test cricket.
“This isn’t just about one player,” said Johnson. “It’s about a larger pattern. If players start skipping Tests — especially finals — for T20 leagues, then where is this game headed?”
He further added that the Australian cricket team has historically been known for putting country above everything else. “Wearing the Baggy Green used to mean everything. That’s how we were raised. If that culture shifts, Australian cricket could lose its core identity.”
Cricket Australia’s Tightrope Walk
Cricket Australia (CA) has found itself in a difficult position. On the one hand, it doesn’t want to deny players the opportunity to earn from high-profile leagues like the IPL, which offer financial security and global exposure. On the other hand, CA is also trying to maintain the integrity of its national schedule — especially major events like the WTC Final or the Ashes.
Sources within the board suggest that while Hazlewood had CA’s permission to play in the IPL, there was an expectation that he would prioritise his rehabilitation and preparation for national duties.
Mixed Reactions from the Cricketing Fraternity
While Johnson has been forthright in his criticism, others have offered a more nuanced take. Some analysts argue that in the modern era, players have to balance career longevity, earnings, and national commitments carefully. The physical toll of fast bowling, especially with the amount of cricket played today, often forces players to make difficult choices.
Former Australian captain Ricky Ponting commented, “We need to support players and trust their judgment, but it’s also fair to expect commitment for once-in-a-career matches like a WTC Final.”
What This Means for Hazlewood’s Future
With fierce competition for spots in Australia’s pace lineup — featuring names like Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Scott Boland, and rising stars like Lance Morris — Hazlewood may face scrutiny not just for fitness but also for his choices off the field. Selectors and fans alike may be watching his commitment to the longer format closely.
If he’s unable to feature in future Test series due to similar prioritisation of leagues over country, his role in the Test side could come under threat.
The Broader Impact on Test Cricket
This incident once again raises broader concerns about the future of Test cricket. As T20 leagues proliferate and offer unparalleled earning potential, governing bodies must find a balance to ensure the longest format remains attractive and respected.
Mitchell Johnson’s criticism may seem harsh to some, but it underscores a sentiment shared by many former players who fear that the traditions and values of Test cricket are slowly eroding.